Thursday, January 3, 2013

Illinois lawmakers commit open treason

An Illinois Senate committee passes through strict gun restrictions, that go against the constitutional grain of all federal rulings on the topic.  The public health committee voted to go ahead with legislation that is intended to ban all semi-automatic rifles, AND pistols.   This committee is made up of the following individuals:

Chairperson :William DelgadoD
Vice-Chairperson :Mattie HunterD
Member:Susan GarrettD
Member:Michael NolandD
Member:Jeffrey M. SchoenbergD
Member:Heather A. SteansD
Minority Spokesperson :Dave SyversonR
Member:Shane CultraR
Member:Christine J. JohnsonR
Member:Carole PankauR

The news article quotes them as voting across party lines, so assume anyone with a D after their name, to have committed perjury of their oath of office.

The treason portion comes from Governor Quinn when he made this statement:

"There is no place in Illinois for weapons designed to rapidly fire at human targets at close range,"

However, author of the bill, Anthony Munoz, who is a member of the Police Union, supports the carrying of semi-automatic handguns, and M4 rifles by police.   This is an admission that the authoritarian powers of Illinois have declared open war on the citizens.   If what Quinn said was true, and semi-automatic weapons have no defensive purpose, and are only a close range rapid human killers... then why do they want the Police to have them?    If what Quinn said is true... the ONLY reason Police have them, is to rapidly kill citizens of the State of Illinois.  

If Quinn admits they have a defensive purpose for citizens and Police, then he's committed perjury by violating his Oath of Office, by violating the equal protections clause of the 14th amendment, and attempting to nullify the 2nd amendment.   Remember his Oath, in which he swore to defend the constitution of the United States of America, even the parts of it he doesn't like.

"I do solemnly swear (affirm) that I will support the
Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of
the State of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge
the duties of the office of .... to the best of my ability."

Perjury:
In Illinois Law:
    (720 ILCS 5/32-2) (from Ch. 38, par. 32-2)     Sec. 32-2. Perjury.     (a) A person commits perjury when, under oath or affirmation, in a proceeding or in any other matter where by law the oath or affirmation is required, he or she makes a false statement, material to the issue or point in question, knowing the statement is false.  

In Federal Law:

-CITE-
18 USC Sec. 1621 01/03/2012 (112-90)
Whoever -
(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer,
or person, in any case in which a law of the United States
authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify,
declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony,
declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is
true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes
any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement
under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title
28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material
matter which he does not believe to be true;
is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly
provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the
statement or subscription is made within or without the United
States.

It's time to hold these Lawbreaker-makers accountable...  

8 comments:

  1. It is noteworthy that all the Democrats on this committee are either from Chicago or one of it's suburban cohorts. Our only hope is the full legislature.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good news, the bills seem to have lost steam as they found they wouldn't have enough support with the full senate... but please remember who tried... and hold them accountable.

      Delete
    2. I'm more liberal, but the 2nd amendment is clear. I was brought up as a huntsman and a outdoorsman. They wont take my guns away.

      Delete
  2. so press charges

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would love to pursue charges, but the federal district court is in Chicago. I feel it would take more than just one guy making noise.

      Delete
  3. Good luck...but my guess is the liberals are so busy cheering, they won't have time to care about the rights they are losing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm still studying this, but I understand you need to press charges against the offending politician until you get passed the bureaucrats and the charges reach a grand jury. A grand jury should recommend (demand) a trial and even a crooked judge will hear it just to save his own ass.

    Judges are still worried about charges being brought against them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Canadian Man acquitted of charges in home attack
    By Jeff Davis, The Canadian Press | Associated Press http://yhoo.it/Z7WkJn
    Dan-O 130105


    Canadian [and IL] anti-gun, anti-self defense Fascists are just as rabid as Stalin & Hitler's. Good for Mr. Thompson! Huzzah! [BTW, what happened to Mr. Thompson's collection, which was summarily confiscated by the Canadian Schutzstaffel? How about an update?!]

    Also BTW, Mr. Thompson was lucky to have had the time to acquire his firearm from the safe. He and his family are lucky they weren't incinerated by the arsonists - because of the rules laid down by Canada's anti-gun Nazis. [So, our anti-gun Nazis want us to adopt Canada's plan - or worse. Not just No, but H3LL NO!]

    The good, REAL Americans in IL are nuts if they allow this hideous, unConstitutional perfidy to stand!

    ReplyDelete