Saturday, January 28, 2012

Media fails to get details, again.

Police responding to a domestic situation called upon their elite Hostage Barricade Terrorist Unit.   Once again, this is a report of Police either firing their guns to either intimidate someone, or to try to kill them but missing.

although police fired a shot at a man with a knife the situation ended without any injuries, police said.  
There are several important questions the media never asks, like what was the man doing with the knife?   What kind of knife was it?   Certain types of knives, like butter knives don't warrant being shot at.    The lack of details on the situation are disturbing enough.  Not to mention the fact that an elite Hostage Barricade Terrorist Unit discharged a firearm in a populated city, which as I understand is against many laws in most states, because that bullet has to go somewhere which could injure a person you can't see.    I guess when you have a badge general laws that pertain to the basic health and safety of the community no longer matter.  

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Good news in Gary Indiana

A thief attempting to rob one of the few Rally's restaurants in the midwest met an untimely end when they suddenly realized while Gary Indiana is close to Chicago, it's in a state that lets its citizens defend themselves.   The result was one criminal was dead on the street, and all the workers at the restaurant were safe.   The police were of course critical and simultaneously supportive of the hero's actions stating with Detective Del Stout stating:

“While we don’t encourage people being robbed to take the law into their own hands, it did work out in this instance. There is no telling what might have happened if the employee had not had a weapon.”

Since when was self-defense taking the "law" into your own hands?   Self defense is life or death... and this cop wants to make it sound like they could have had a committee meeting about it!    If detective Del Stout really wants to know what would have happened if the fast food restaurant had been unarmed, he need only look 40 miles northwest to the Brown's Chicken Massacre, which now has its own Wikipedia page...   Keep protecting yourselves Indiana, don't pay attention to what the police encourage, if the police don't lock their own guns in a cabinet at home and patrol without them, then neither should you leave your guns at home!

Thursday, January 12, 2012

More Field Sobriety Test Hypocrisy

A Chicago Police officer, Richard Bolling who was charged with a fatal DUI crash in 2009, is now being claimed he passed a field sobriety test, AND a breathalyzer.   There are further claims that he did not receive any special treatment for being a police officer. 

So let's go over the norm...  You are involved in a fatal car accident, the police arrive.   Within minutes you would be issued a breathalyzer, if there was any alcohol at all on your breath, you would be arrested and processed since you just killed someone.   How did Richard Bolling get treated?

"It was four and a half hours after the crash, and only under pressure from an Internal Affairs sergeant, when Bolling submitted to a Breathalyzer and registered 0.079 percent, just under the legal limit of 0.08 percent, prosecutors said."

Yes... the lack of special treatment is VERY apparent in this case... 4.5 hours after the crash, he blew .001 under the legal limit... does this stink to anyone else, or just me?   It gets better though...

Prosecutors alleged in opening statements that Bolling, who was off-duty at the time, wasn’t given a field sobriety test until nearly two hours after he was arrested driving the wrong way down a street shortly after the crash. Officers at the scene said he passed the exam.
So he drove away from his accident... and got pulled over shortly after the crash going the wrong way on the roadway...   Meanwhile the same field sobriety test that is designed to incriminate non Law Enforcement Officials, managed to add evidence that Bolling wasn't impaired.   When the system is this broken, the only solution is to cut all funding to the offending agencies, and start them fresh with rules that prevent abuse.  

Of course his Law Enforcement Brothers were caught saying interesting things during the course of events:

According to court filings by prosecutors, an undisclosed superior officer was captured on a video recording at the crash scene telling Bolling he would “try to help you out as much as possible.”

Does this make sense to everyone now?   If you kill a 13 year old after drinking on the road, you are the scum of the earth, and many people would argue for the death penalty for you, or Lock you up for 20 years. But if a Police officer kills a 13 year old after drinking on the road... he's a great guy who just had an accident as illustrated by these media statements:

Bolling, who is expected to testify, joined the force in 1992 and had been working in the narcotics unit. The son of a retired Chicago police officer, Bolling received 20 honorable mentions and numerous department commendations and had no prior criminal record.

Imagine that, Bolling had no criminal record... hard to imagine he swung that feat, even though he BARELY got arrested for Vehicular Manslaughter!     The system doesn't work the same for you as it does for them, and then "they" wonder where the us vs. them attitude comes from.